<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:33:27 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Peter Asmus | Pathfinder Communications</title><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>The Value of Real-Time Wind Power Forecasting</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:50:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2010/7/24/the-value-of-real-time-wind-power-forecasting.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:8350681</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The rapid growth of wind power is offering new challenges for transmission grid operators throughout the world, especially in the U.S.&nbsp; As wind power levels comprise an ever larger portion of utility supply portfolios, rapid changes in the speed and direction of wind resources often cause wind farms to deviate significantly from scheduled deliveries. When this happens, grid operators must tap into volatile spot market to keep the transmission grid in balance.</p>
<p>The value of spot market purchases required to balance the grid can cost from -100/MegaWatt hour (MWh) (during times of oversupply) up to $6,000/MWh (during times of supply shortages), depending upon wholesale supply conditions. Near real-time forecasting data for wind could be worth millions of dollars &ndash; both earned and saved &ndash;- but so far, few of the handful of firms that provide wind resource assessment and forecasting have developed a coherent business strategy to tap this emerging market for their products and services.</p>
<p>When compared to simple reliance upon climatology, an advanced forecasting system will reduce short-term forecasting errors by 40 to 60%. The magnitude of potential revenue losses can reach almost $4/MWh.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-8350681.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Why California Cannot Trust Giving "Power to the People!"</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:42:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2010/5/11/why-california-cannot-trust-giving-power-to-the-people.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:7640981</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The initiative process was originally designed by the so-called &ldquo;Progressives&rdquo; in 1911 as a means to bring &ldquo;power of the people," since the California Legislature was then in the tight grip of powerful railroads, which controlled the Democratic Party.</p>
<p>While the term &ldquo;progressive&rdquo; is most often associated with the Democratic Party today, these Progressives were Republican reformers. They successfully amended the State Constitution empowering voters to create new laws in the same way they elected legislators, placing California among the leaders of &ldquo;direct democracy,&rdquo; which has since spread to 24 states.</p>
<p>When the "Community Choice Aggregation" (CCA) state law was passed in 2002, it, too, was seen as a way to bring &ldquo;power to the people&rdquo; in the form of cleaner electricity supplies to Bay Area local governments tired of waiting for Washington, DC -- and Sacramento -- to do something about global warming.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-7640981.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Signs of Progress in southern California Deserts</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:19:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2010/3/29/signs-of-progress-in-southern-california-deserts.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:7175028</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Efforts to resolve&nbsp;the&nbsp;roadblocks&nbsp;between environmentalists and renewable  energy advocates have born fruit in the&nbsp;sunny southern California desert. Gov.  Schwarzenegger and&nbsp;President Obama's&nbsp;Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced on  March 22nd <a title="New State Law Offers Hope for Desert Renewables" href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx8_34_bill_20100322_chaptered.html" target="_blank">a  new collaborative process </a>designed to both conserve land for endangered  species <em>and </em>stream line permits for new renewable projects jeopardized  by any further delays.</p>
<p>The breakthrough was announced at a press conference celebrating the signing  of new state legislation <a title="New State Legislation for Renewable Project Streamlining" href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sbx8_34&amp;sess=CUR&amp;house=B&amp;author=padilla" target="_blank">SBX8  34&nbsp;</a>, a bill that will ensure state regulatory agencies have the resources  necessary to focus on the state's stringent environmental review process while  still issuing permits for new&nbsp;renewable energy facilities. The bill creates  further efficiencies in the permitting and siting process for large-scale  renewable energy projects that could qualify for federal stimulus funds.</p>
<p>The measure has won some qualified support from environmentalists. A unique  confluence of events -- including deadlines for federal renewable development  subsidies -- helped pave the way for approval of the state legislation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-7175028.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Wind Industry Growing Pains</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:15:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2010/2/27/wind-industry-growing-pains.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:6853676</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Wind turbine technology has become a fully commercial venture, but the recent rapid growth of the wind industry has strained its supply chain to meet demand in a timely manner. Furthermore, unexpected component failures, especially electronic controls, gearboxes, generators, and rotor blades, have driven up Operations &amp; Maintenance (O&amp;M) costs.</p>
<p>During the course of the research for a new report just published by <a href="http://www.windenergyupdate.com/operations-maintenance-report/index.html">Wind Energy Update, </a>it ultimately became clear that reliable and verifiable data on wind industry O&amp;M cost trends is quite rare. In fact, there are no current widely available data sets illustrating these wind industry O&amp;M costs. Proprietary research, reviews of scarce secondary sources and anecdotal evidence obtained through confidential interviews with wind industry owner/operators and component suppliers suggest that O&amp;M expenses are double or even triple what was originally projected, particularly with the latest class of multi-megawatt machines now permeating the global wind market.</p>
<p>Of course, nearly all machine and electrical components have a certain chance of failure within their design lifetime, and wind turbines are no different. Savvy operators can make problematic turbines look better through innovative in the field O&amp;M strategies, and vice versa. Nonetheless, the wind industry&rsquo;s promises of delivering cost effective clean renewable energy to combat global climate change is being compromised by higher than expected component failure rates. Gearboxes allegedly designed for a 20-year life are breaking down prematurely across most major manufacturing brands, are failing after only 6 to 8 years of operation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-6853676.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Moving Beyond Copenhagen: Cap and Trade Versus Carbon Tax</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:15:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2009/12/19/moving-beyond-copenhagen-cap-and-trade-versus-carbon-tax.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:6097749</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>A coalition of the environmental and business leaders appear committed to passing a new &ldquo;cap-and-trade&rdquo; system through Congress, designed to somehow protect the world from the impending doom of climate change. While the focus of the world this past week was on Copenhagen, the ball is, for all practical purposes, still in the court of the U.S. Congress.</p>
<p>Even with the introduction of the new Kerry-Leiberman-Graham legislation during Copenhagen, a surprisingly broad set of interests are beginning to emerge on behalf of fresh alternatives that may include incentives for renewables, EPA regulations and maybe even a novel market-based approach:&nbsp; a carbon fee that is rebated back to the public.</p>
<p>Organizations as diverse as Sierra Club and Chevron are quietly contemplating what a &ldquo;Plan B&rdquo; might include, and how it could yield broader political support, and more environmental success, than today&rsquo;s competing House and Senate omnibus &ldquo;cap-and-trade&rdquo; bills.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-6097749.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Microgrid Revolution...</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2009/11/6/the-microgrid-revolution.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:5721134</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Microgrids have a long history. In fact, Thomas Edison&rsquo;s first power plant constructed in 1882 &ndash; the Manhattan Pearl Street Station &ndash; was essentially a microgrid since our centralized grid was not yet established. By 1886, Edison&rsquo;s firm had installed 58 Direct Current (DC) microgrids.</p>
<p>Shortly thereafter, however, the evolution of the electric services industry evolved to a state-regulated monopoly market, taking away incentives for microgrid developments.</p>
<p>Today, however, a variety of trends are converging to create promising markets for microgrids, particularly in the U.S. it has been become increasingly clear that the fundamental architecture of today&rsquo;s electricity grid based on the idea of a top-down system predicated on unidirectional energy flows is now obsolete. With the election of Barack Obama as President of the U.S. in 2008, and the subsequent passage of government stimulus funding packages in 2009 to respond to the economic recession, significant new federal funds are being earmarked for the &ldquo;smart grid,&rdquo; positioning the U.S. as the global market leader in microgrids.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-5721134.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>If I were the new CEO of Chevron</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2009/10/13/if-i-were-the-new-ceo-of-chevron.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:5477493</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>If I were the new CEO of Chevron, I would stop listening to the lawyers and bring the engineers into the boardroom to develop a strategy to invest a good portion of last year&rsquo;s record $24 billion profit into inventing solutions to the adverse environmental and social impacts of the company&rsquo;s operations around the globe.&nbsp;</p>
<p>New Chevron CEO John &nbsp;Watson has inherited a mess from outgoing CEO David O&rsquo; Reilly &ndash; but with challenge comes opportunity. It is clear that Chevron&rsquo;s historical reliance upon litigation to get what it wants is being eclipsed by new activist strategies that have effectively boxed Chevron into a corner.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-5477493.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Locavore, Locavolt &amp; Local Land</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:12:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2009/9/2/locavore-locavolt-local-land.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:5069548</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>In my new book, <em>Introduction to Energy in California, </em>I describe the history of energy in California and highlight how West Marin could serve as a potential model for taking charge of our own energy future. Learn how sustainable microgrids can bring community back into the energy equation, answering challenges on both environmental and economic fronts.</p>
<p>On Sunday, September 13th, come to the Dance Palace in Point Reyes Station and learn about the movement to transition communities from dependence on fossil fuels to a local food, local energy, and local farm future...and then visit McEvoy Olive Ranch near Petaluma.</p>
<p>Bernie Stephen of Transition West Marin will describe how communities can create resilience and reduce carbon emissions in response to peak oil and climate change.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-5069548.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>New Book from University of California Press!</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:43:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2009/7/8/new-book-from-university-of-california-press.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:4564509</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>My fourth book on energy and environmental issues was just released by the University of California Press. Entitled <em>Introduction to Energy in California, </em>this 400-page plus book is unlike any of my previous books: <em>Reaping The Wind; Reinventing Electric Utilities </em>and <em>In Search of Environmental Excellence. <br /></em></p>
<p>Why is it different?</p>
<p><span>First off, I was not only the author, but the Art Program manager. What that means is that I was responsible for selecting and gaining permission to use over 90 photographs, 42 line illustrations, 18 maps and 8 Tables. The book features historical photos, many of them from Pacific Gas &amp; Electric and Chevron, featuring early hydroelectric innovations in the Sierra Nevada foothills as well as early oil development in southern California.</span></p>
<p>The other aspect that is different is that this is a science-based reference book. No need to preach to the choir. Let's try to look at energy in a comprehensive and non-politicized way.The theme that runs through the book is that California has always gone out on a limb and embraced nearly every energy source with wild-eyed enthusiasm.</p>
<p><span></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-4564509.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Is Water a Human Right?</title><dc:creator>Peter Asmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/2009/6/22/is-water-a-human-right.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">74801:643148:4408009</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">When drought brought a critical shortage of water to Kerala, India, anti-globalization activists placed part of the blame on Coca-Cola, which operated a plant there. Critics contended that Coca-Cola failed to involve the local community in its plans and built a substantial global movement against water privatization, employing the tactic of &ldquo;brand-jacking&rdquo; of the world&rsquo;s No. 1 brand &ndash; Coke -- to make their point.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">Today, Coke&rsquo;s Kerala plant is closed &ndash; a casualty of the global pressure placed on the company.<span> </span>But the campaign against corporate water has only grown stronger.<span> </span>Today, the focus is on bottled water, which critics point to as a wasteful, expensive example of water privatization &ndash; companies taking public water, repackaging it, and selling it back to us for a profit.<span> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">But the water wars have just begun.<span> </span>Bottled water may be today&rsquo;s popular target.<span> </span>But activists are beginning to look beyond bottled water, setting their sites on much bigger objectives.<span> </span>At stake, they believe, is whether water is recognized as a basic human right, or becomes simply another commodity controlled by giant corporations.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterasmus.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-4408009.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>